Web Conferencing: Advantages of a Native App vs. a Web App

I am often asked why StartMeeting requires a download, or plug-in, for a host or participant to access a meeting.  Invariably, I found myself back-pedaling in search of a well-constructed response to a very pertinent question.

Then, it hit me.  Well, actually, I read a very good explanation for the fundamental differences between each approach.  Below are excerpts from an article by Max Katz, which was published in the Jan/Feb 2013 issue of INTERNET TELEPHONY Magazine.

Native apps are usually fast and polished, making them great for high performance apps or games.  Mobile web apps perform well, but still fall behind native app performance.

Many business applications do not necessarily require such high levels of performance.  In these cases, web apps are more cost effective.  On the other hand, [applications] that require more advanced performance features should utilize native development.

A native app can produce the best user experience, can give you the best access to device features, and can be discovered in the app stores.  On the other hand, building a native app on every major platform requires more socialized skills, a longer time to market, and a bigger budget to build and maintain. 

Thanks, Max.  I could not have said it better myself… really.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s